[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: General policy
- To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
- Subject: RE: General policy
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald.t.alvestrand@delab.sintef.no>
- Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1993 09:43:57 +0200
- Cc: ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM
- In-reply-to: <9308030116.AA02667@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
- Resent-message-id: <01H1AG3HPI02984SD3@INNOSOFT.COM>
- X400-Content-type: P2-1984 (2)
- X400-MTS-identifier: [/PRMD=uninett/ADMD= /C=no/;930803094357]
- X400-Originator: harald.t.alvestrand@delab.sintef.no
- X400-Received: by mta aun.uninett.no in /PRMD=uninett/ADMD= /C=no/; Relayed;Tue, 3 Aug 1993 09:47:40 +0200
- X400-Received: by /PRMD=uninett/ADMD= /C=no/; Relayed; Tue,3 Aug 1993 09:44:00 +0200
- X400-Received: by /PRMD=uninett/ADMD= /C=no/; Relayed; Tue,3 Aug 1993 09:43:57 +0200
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
I'm completely serious.
1) The number of character set experts in the IETF is close to zero.
Not a bad thing - experts tend to quarrel too much.
2) Stamping out *all* alternatives to the "ultimate solution" at once
is not likely to be possible. Hence, labelling.
Harald A