IETF-CHARSETS Mailing List Index
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- RE: CHARSET considerations
- IETF BOF
- RE: IETF BOF
- RE: Who knows about 10646 escape sequences?
- Languages and character sets
- Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- NET-TEXT: an extension of UTF-2 (long)
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- summary of ucs-bof in the last IETF
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- RE: Thoughts about characters transmission
- General policy
- RE: General policy
- UTF-2 and standardization
- RE: UTF-2 and standardization
- RE: UTF-2 and standardization
- RE: UTF-2 and standardization -- added 10646 *L1 registrations
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- Equality
- RE: General policy
- RE: Equality
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: UTF-2 and standardization
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- BOF minutes
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: Equality
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- RE: General policy
- Meta non-discussion (could be ignored)
- RE: Meta non-discussion (could be ignored)
- RE: Meta non-discussion (could be ignored)
- RE: Meta non-discussion (could be ignored)
- RE: Meta non-discussion (could be ignored)
- RE: BOF minutes
- RE: Meta non-discussion (could be ignored)
- any specific issue?
- RE: any specific issue?
- RE: any specific issue?
- RE: any specific issue?
- RE: BOF
- FYI
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- charter
- RE: BOF
- RE: BOF
- UTF-2 copy urgently needed
- ASN.1 debates about character set encoding
- ASN.1 debates about character set encoding
- Subsribe
- RE: Unicode progress
- RE: Unicode progress
- RE: Unicode progress
- ietf-charsets archives [was: Re: Unicode progress]
- RE: Unicode progress
- RE: Unicode progress
- RE: Unicode progress
- UTF or bare encoding
- RE: Unicode progress
- RE: Unicode progress
- RE: Unicode progress
- RE: Unicode progress
- RE: Unicode progress
- RE: Unicode progress
- Compatibility with Unicode
- RE: Compatibility with Unicode
- ISO/IEC 10646 compatibility
- RE: ISO/IEC 10646 compatibility
- another opinion
- RE: Compatibility with Unicode
- RE: Compatibility with Unicode
- RE: another opinion
- RE: another opinion
- Unicode support in X11
- RE: A spec for showing language in MIME headers
- RE: A spec for showing language in MIME headers
- Plain text
- 10646 and progr.languages
- RE: 10646 and progr.languages
- RE: Compatibility with Unicode
- FYI
- Interoperable Localizaion/Internationalization
- Re: Proposals for 10646/Unicode in MIME
- Re: Proposals for 10646/Unicode in MIME
- Re: Proposals for 10646/Unicode in MIME
- subscribe
- Re: Proposals for 10646/Unicode in MIME
- Re: Proposals for 10646/Unicode
- comments on the offic.standpoint of Japan
- Re: Proposals for 10646/Unicode in MIME
- Re: comments on the offic.standpoint of Japan
- Proposals for 10646/Unicode
- Mailing list INSOFT-L
- Don't we need a standard way to represent language in Unicode?
- Re: Don't we need a standard way to represent language in Unicode?
- Re: Don't we need a standard way to represent language in Unicode?
- Re: Mailing list INSOFT-L
- Re: Don't we need a standard way to represent language in Unicode?
- Re: Don't we need a standard way to represent language in Unicode?
- RFD: New Usenet newsgroup comp.software.internat
- Re: RFD: New Usenet newsgroup comp.software.internat
- Re: New forum (comp.software.internat) on i18n
- Unicode/MIME Internet drafts posted
- Metaquestion on this group
- Re: Metaquestion on this group
- Re: Metaquestion on this group
- Re: Metaquestion on this group
- Re: Metaquestion on this group
- Re: Metaquestion on this group
- Re: Metaquestion on this group
- Multilingual plain text
- Re: Metaquestion on this group
- CFV: comp.software.international
- New UTF-7 draft
- Re: New UTF-7 draft
- Re: New UTF-7 draft
- Re: New UTF-7 draft
- Re: New UTF-7 draft
- 2nd CFV: comp.software.international
- subscribe
- Nice character pictures?
- UTF-7 sample implementation
- mailing list gateway for comp.software.international
- Small comment to UTF-7 draft
- RE: Small comment to UTF-7 draft
- Invitation: Sept. 8-9, Unicode Workshop 6, Bay Area
- RE: Small comment to UTF-7 draft
- RE: Small comment to UTF-7 draft
- Unicode MIME character sets registered
- IETF/IAB and charsets (Re: SWEDISH CHARACTERS IN EMAIL)
- C3 System for character set conversion available for alpha testing
- Unicode Web Page Now Available!
- Runes in ISO 10646/Unicode?!
- Re: Runes in ISO 10646/Unicode?!
- Languages and character sets - new issue!
- Re: Character Encoding Denotation
- The EUPHORIA Tape...
- ISO-8859-10; registration of new charset values; error in MIME draft
- Registration of new character set
- Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Re: Call for proposals
- Errors in charset registrations for Arabic and Hebrew
- FREE UNDERGROUND CATALOG
- HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE AT COST
- DONTFORGET
- Re: DONTFORGET
- FREE CAREERS AND HOME BUSINESS NEWSLETTER
- HBB
- From: "JKC.Ent."@ix.netcom.com
- Graphic E-Mail
- From: graphic@[206.101.23.163]
- Graphic E-Mail
- From: graphic@[206.101.23.163]
- 70% OFF Software !!!
- CLOSES
- subscribe
- Re: CLOSES & Co.
- Invitation/reminder
- Send FREE Bulk Email...
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-00.txt
- (comm)
- subscribe ietf-charsets John Clews
- I NEED HELP !
- Paradise
- Ideal Christmas Gift For E-Mail Friends, Even on Dec 25th
- "Find The Dirt On The Internet"-Updated!!
- Cool !
- Get Quick Results!
- *** 8 MILLION E-Mail Addresses ***
- HERPES and Cold Sores - Prevention and Suppression
- Spammers on IETF-charsets
- Part-time Hours, Executive Pay
- Earn An Extra $100 Cash Daily, From Your Home!
- Loose Change
- UTF-7 registration: any objections?
- Re: UTF-7 registration: any objections?
- Re: UTF-7 registration: any objections?
- Check Out This Product !!
- Earn An Extra $100 Cash Daily, From Your Home!
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-goldsmith-utf7-01.txt
- Internet Alert! Pay for local dial-up??
- Downline of 1,000 in 90 Days
- Internet Alert! Pay for local dial-up??
- Hello
- About Golf Balls
- Adults Only !
- " FREE Logo Watch For Businesses."
- FREE Info for You!
- Secrets = Hits = Sales
- charsets list? (was Secrets = Hits = Sales)
- Re: charsets list? (was Secrets = Hits = Sales)
- Re: charsets list? (was Secrets = Hits = Sales)
- Re: charsets list? (was Secrets = Hits = Sales)
- Re: charsets list? (was Secrets = Hits = Sales)
- http://www.webspawner.com/users/warningwarning/
- From: http://www.webspawner.com/users/warningwarning/
- ** $50,000 IN LESS THAN 90 DAYS ! **
- All Aboard!!
- Web Site Announcements
- NO MORE AOL BUSY SIGNALS !
- VIVA LAS VEGAS
- Save over 50% on Office Pro 97 & Select Phone
- Another anti-spam idea
- Re: Another anti-spam idea
- Re: Another anti-spam idea
- FREE AIRLINE TICKETS 1-800-563-964
- .AN MLM & INTERNET BREAKTHRU!!
- Hair Raiser Coffee
- ISO work on transliteration
- Free Tape "Natural Progesterone"
- No Subject
- ***Lose Weight Eating Three Meals A Day***
- Cyber Wonderland For ADULTS
- From: http://www.cyberdelights.com
- HOT SPOT!
- heeey :-D
- *** 8 MILLION E-MAIL ADDRESSES ***
- FREE CASH GRANTS
- Re: charsets list? (was Secrets = Hits = Sales)
- Miracle Weight Loss ....
- Re: charsets list? (was Secrets = Hits = Sales)
- Free Stuff!!
- 5.9% APR GUARANTEED CREDIT CARDS?
- Re: 5.9% APR GUARANTEED CREDIT CARDS?
- Save over 50% on Microsoft Office Pro 97 & Select Phone !!
- READ THIS TWICE!!!
- From: "." <"."@facteur.std.com>
- Purchase Custom E Mail Lists
- Hi.
- it's Guaranteed
- GET $500 FREE WORTH OF INFORMATION...
- Hi
- No Subject
- Get Into The 900 Busine$$
- Make Big $$$ Online - Secret Revealed
- ===> Start Your Own 900 Busine$$ <===
- UTF-7 draft ready for RFC
- Make Big $$$ Online - Secret Revealed
- Free 19 cent/min phone card-send self-addressed, stamped envelope!
- FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
- New UTF-8 draft (RFC 2044 revision)
- Re: New UTF-8 draft (RFC 2044 revision)
- Registration of new character set
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Eleventh International Unicode Conference
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Registration of UTF-7
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Whither ANSI X3.64? (was Re: Suggested character set policy for theIETF)
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
- Re: Whither ANSI X3.64? (was Re: Suggested character set policy forthe IETF)
- Eleventh International Unicode Conference - Rates going up!
- Your draft about iso-2022-jp
- Charset policy - Post Munich
- RE: Your draft about iso-2022-jp
- For the record
- Re: Charset policy - Post Munich
- RE: Your draft about iso-2022-jp
- RE: Your draft about iso-2022-jp
- Re: For the record
- RE: Your draft about iso-2022-jp
- Re: For the record
- Re: Charset policy - Post Munich
- UTF-8 revision
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- Re: Charset policy - Post Munich
- Re: Charset policy - Post Munich
- Re: Charset policy - Post Munich
- Re: Charset policy - Post Munich
- Re: Charset policy - Post Munich
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich (fwd)
- Charset policy
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- Default Language
- MAJOR CREDIT CARD - WE GOT OURS, DID YOU?
- Hello :-)
- Power Tools For Webmasters
- Bulk Mailers...Your Dream Software is Here !!
- Mutual Funds - The Real Deal
- LUXURY CARS under $1000
- 5000 FREE
- Money, Sex, Technology and Home Bus
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- UNLIMITED CELLULAR IS HERE!!!!
- Leading Nutritional Supplements
- Bulk Advertising ! Cheap Cheap Cheap !
- Real 6 Figure Income Possible
- Post Munich: Blue sheet?
- It's Here!
- You Can Now Dramatically Increase Your Sexual Attractiveness!
- ADULTS ONLY
- Make Money With Your PC
- Are You Searching For A Record Deal?
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- Microsoft Office - How To Train Employees
- Bulk Email For Profit
- Accept Major Credit Cards...Online Merchant Accounts!
- I thought you might like to read this.
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- UTF-7 RFC need revision?
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- new version of draft-alvestrand-charset-policy.txt
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- 12th International Unicode Conference, Tokyo,April 1998 - Call for Papers
- mailing list address
- Re: mailing list address
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- Re: new version of draft-alvestrand-charset-policy.txt
- Re: new version of draft-alvestrand-charset-policy.txt
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- RE: Charset policy - Post Munich
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- Comments to draft-freed-charset-reg-04.txt
- Re: Comments to draft-freed-charset-reg-04.txt
- Re: new version of draft-alvestrand-charset-policy.txt
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- New Default Language paragraph
- Re: UTF-8 revision
- Re: New Default Language paragraph
- Re: New Default Language paragraph
- Re: New Default Language paragraph
- Version -02 of the charset policy
- Last Call: IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages to BCP
- 2nd Call for Papers - 12th International Unicode Conference, Tokyo,April 1998
- Last Call for Papers - 12th International Unicode Conference, Tokyo,April 1998
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mixer-directory-03.txt
- Re: New Default Language paragraph
- Unicode Conference, Tokyo, April 1998, extended to 3 days
- Re: New Default Language paragraph
- Mistake in Alias in charset registry - bad alias name
- Re: Mistake in Alias in charset registry - bad alias name
- Protocol Action: IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages to BCP
- Registration of new charset
- Registration of new charset
- Re: Registration of new charset
- Re: Registration of new charset
- Re: Registration of new charset
- prefer-language tag
- re: prefer-language tag
- re: prefer-language tag
- re: prefer-language tag
- re: prefer-language tag
- re: prefer-language tag
- Re: prefer-language tag
- RE: prefer-language tag
- Re: prefer-language tag
- Re: prefer-language tag
- Re: prefer-language tag
- Re: prefer-language tag
- Re: prefer-language tag
- Re: prefer-language tag
- re: prefer-language tag
- Re: prefer-language tag
- Re: prefer-language tag
- Registration of UTF-7
- Re: Registration of UTF-7
- registration of a new charset: iso-8859-15
- Re: registration of a new charset: iso-8859-15
- Re: registration of a new charset: iso-8859-15
- Re: registration of a new charset: iso-8859-15
- Re: registration of a new charset: iso-8859-15
- Re: registration of a new charset: iso-8859-15
- Re: registration of a new charset: iso-8859-15
- Re: registration of a new charset: iso-8859-15
- Re: registration of a new charset: iso-8859-15
- registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1 [MIME/Internet]
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1 [MIME/Internet]
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1 [MIME]
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- RE: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1 [cs and MIBenum needed]
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1 [cs and MIBenum needed]
- No Subject
- No Subject
- No Subject
- No Subject
- No Subject
- Plane 14: SC2/WG2 position on Language Tag Characters
- Re: registration of iso-8859-15: v1.1
- UTF-7
- Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: UTF-7
- Re: UTF-7
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- RE: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Widetext (was Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16")
- RE: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- RE: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Widetext (was Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16")
- RE: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- RE: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- RE: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- RE: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- International registry of coded character sets available on the web
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: International registry of coded character sets available on the web
- RE: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
- UTF-16 HTML documents are available,
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- RE: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- RE: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- RE: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- RE: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- RE: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: UTF-16 HTML documents are available,
- UTF-16 and Mozilla
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- HTTP Range and BOM
- Re: HTTP Range and BOM
- ANNOUNCE: new charset soups (ISO 8859, Cyrillic, Unicode, Euro, ...)
- Charset reviewer appointed
- UTF-16
- Re: UTF-16
- Re: UTF-16
- W3C Working Draft on character model requirements
- PROPOSED DRAFT Unicode Technical Report #15
- 13th International Unicode Conference, September 1998, San Jose
- Fwd: UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- RE: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- UTF-16 [was: Re: Charset reviewer appointed]
- Re: UTF-16 [was: Re: Charset reviewer appointed]
- RE: UTF-16 [was: Re: Charset reviewer appointed]
- Re: Fwd: UTF-16
- Re: Charset reviewer appointed
- Re: Fwd: UTF-16
- I am now on the ietf-charsets ML.
- Re: Charset reviewer appointed
- Re: Charset reviewer appointed
- Re: Charset reviewer appointed
- Re: Charset reviewer appointed
- RE: Revised proposal for UTF-16
- Re: Charset reviewer appointed
- Re: Charset reviewer appointed
- Re: Charset reviewer appointed
- UTF-16 (was: Re: Charset reviewer appointed)
- Re: UTF-16 (was: Re: Charset reviewer appointed)
- 13th Int'l Unicode Conference, Sep 1998, San Jose -- 1st reminder
- Registration of new charset
- Registration of new charset
- TR6 charset
- Re: TR6 charset
- 13th Int'l Unicode Conference, Sep 1998, San Jose -- 2nd reminder
- RE: TR6 charset
- Re: TR6 charset
- Re: TR6 charset
- Re: TR6 charset
- Re: TR6 charset
- Registration of new charset: tis-620
- Clarification of existing charsets
- Last Call for Papers -- Unicode Conference, March 1999, Boston
- Re: Proposed revision of Shift_JIS and Windows-31J
- Hypertext archive available
- RFC on Armenian character sets
- I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-00.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-00.txt
- draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Registration of new charset
- registering another new charset
- Re: registering another new charset
- Re: registering another new charset
- Re: Registration of new charset
- Re: registering another new charset
- Re: registering another new charset
- registering another new charset (corrected)
- Fwd: Proposed revision of Shift_JIS and Windows-31J
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf16-01.txt available
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-02.txt
- XML Syntax WG position on UTF-16
- Re: XML Syntax WG position on UTF-16
- Questions aboutftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets
- Re: Questions aboutftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets
- UCS PUA and charset tags
- Re: UCS PUA and charset tags
- Deprecating charset "unicode-1-1"
- Re: Deprecating charset "unicode-1-1"
- RE: Deprecating charset "unicode-1-1"
- Re: Deprecating charset "unicode-1-1"
- Re: Deprecating charset "unicode-1-1"
- Re: Deprecating charset "unicode-1-1"
- Re: Deprecating charset "unicode-1-1"
- Re: Deprecating charset "unicode-1-1"
- Re: Deprecating charset "unicode-1-1"
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-03.txt
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-03.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-03.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-03.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-03.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-03.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-03.txt
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf16-03.txt
- Charlint (aka charlie)
- charsets registry
- Re: Charlint (aka charlie)
- Re: Charlint (aka charlie)
- Re: Charlint (aka charlie)
- Re: Charlint (aka charlie)
- Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Registration of new charsets
- RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Registration of new charsets
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Registration of new charsets
- Re: Registration of new charsets
- Re: Registration of new charsets
- Re: Registration of new charsets
- Re: Registration of new charsets
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
- Re: Registration of new charsets
- Registration of new charset: Windows-1252
- Fwd: Document Action: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Informational
- Re: Fwd: Document Action: UTF-16,an encoding of ISO 10646 to Informational
- Re: ISO_8859-15 registration without MIBenum and Alias
- Fw: Registration of new charset: Windows-1252
- Document Action: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Informational
- Re: Fw: Registration of new charset: Windows-1252
- Re: Fw: Registration of new charset: Windows-1252
- Registration of new charset: Windows-1252
- Re: Registration of new charset: Windows-1252
- Re: Registration of new charset: Windows-1252
- Re: Registration of new charset: Windows-1252
- RE: Registration of new charset: Windows-1252
- iso-8859-14
- Re: iso-8859-14
- Mailing list address?
- Re: Mailing list address?
- Re: Mailing list address?
- Re: Mailing list address?
- ISO_8859-15 registration
- Re: ISO_8859-15 registration
- Re: ISO_8859-15 registration
- registration of iso-8859-14
- Proposal to register SCSU for IANA
- Re: Proposal to register SCSU for IANA
- RE: Proposal to register SCSU for IANA
- RE: Proposal to register SCSU for IANA
- Re: Proposal to register SCSU for IANA
- Re: Proposal to register SCSU for IANA
- Re: Proposal to register SCSU for IANA
- RE: Proposal to register SCSU for IANA
- RE: Proposal to register SCSU for IANA
- Registration of new charset iso-8859-14
- Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Registration of new charset iso-8859-14
- Re: Registration of new charset iso-8859-14
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Registration of new charset iso-8859-14
- Re: Registration of new charset iso-8859-14
- charset aliases
- Re: charset aliases
- Re: charset aliases
- Re: Registration of new charset iso-8859-14
- Re: Registration of new charset iso-8859-14
- Re: charset aliases
- Re: charset aliases
- Re: charset aliases
- Re: charset aliases
- Re: charset aliases
- Re: charset aliases
- RE: charset aliases
- RE: charset aliases
- Re: Registration of new charset iso-8859-14
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Registration of new charset iso-8859-14
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Rejection of registration of new Japanese charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- [email protected] list address should be fixed
- Re: Rejection of registration of new Japanese charsets
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Registration of new character set
- Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
- Re: Co-authorship of charsets BCP
- Co-authorship of charsets BCP
- Re: Co-authorship of charsets BCP
- Test of list moves
- Re: Registration of new character set
- Registration of new IBM Character Sets
- Re: Registration of new IBM Character Sets
- Re: Registration of new IBM Character Sets
- Registration of new IBM Char Sets
- Re: Registration of new IBM Char Sets
- Re: Registration of new IBM Char Sets
- Re: Registration of new IBM Char Sets
- Re: Registration of new IBM Char Sets
- RE: Registration of new IBM Char Sets
- Re: Last Call: IANA Charset Registration Procedures to BCP
- Re: Last Call: IANA Charset Registration Procedures to BCP
- RE: Last Call: IANA Charset Registration Procedures to BCP
- RE: Last Call: IANA Charset Registration Procedures to BCP
- Re: Registration of new IBM Char Sets
- Re: Registration of new IBM Char Sets
- Questions on charset registration procedures
- Re: Questions on charset registration procedures
- Registration of new charset SCSU
- Re: Registration of new charset SCSU
- Re: Registration of new charset SCSU
- Re: Registration of new charset SCSU
- Re: Registration of new charset SCSU
- Re: Registration of new charset SCSU
- Registration of new charset SCSU
- Fwd: Registration of new character set
- Re: Registration of new charset SCSU
- Re: Registration of new character set
- Re: Last Call: IANA Charset Registration Procedures to BCP
- Re: Last Call: IANA Charset Registration Procedures to BCP
- Re: Last Call: IANA Charset Registration Procedures to BCP
- Fwd: Registration of new charset SCSU
- Re: Fwd: Registration of new charset SCSU
- Re: Fwd: Registration of new charset SCSU
- Re: Fwd: Registration of new charset SCSU
- Progress of SCSU registration?
- MIBenum values for Unicode?
- Re: Progress of SCSU registration?
- Registration of new charset
- Re: Registration of new charset
- Re[2]: Registration of new charset
- Re[2]: Registration of new charset
- Re[2]: Registration of new charset
- FW: Char sets up-to-date
- Re[2]: Registration of new charset
- Re[2]: Registration of new charset
- Fwd: Re[2]: Registration of new charset
- Re[2]: Registration of new charset
- RE: Re[2]: Registration of new charset
- Request for correction of charset registry
- Re: Request for correction of charset registry
- Re: Test
- Re: Test
- Re: Registration of new charsets UTF-32, UTF-32BE, UTF32LE
- Registration of new charsets UTF-32, UTF-32BE, UTF32LE
- Re: Registration of new charsets UTF-32, UTF-32BE, UTF32LE
- Re: Registration of new charsets UTF-32, UTF-32BE, UTF32LE
- Re: Registration of new charsets UTF-32, UTF-32BE, UTF32LE
- Re: Registration of new charsets UTF-32, UTF-32BE, UTF32LE
- Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Registration of new charset: UTF-32BE
- Registration of new charset: UTF-32LE
- Re: Registration of new charsets UTF-32, UTF-32BE, UTF32LE
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Re: Registration of new charsets UTF-32, UTF-32BE, UTF32LE
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Re: Registration of new charsets UTF-32, UTF-32BE, UTF32LE
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Typo in IANA charset file
- Re: Typo in IANA charset file
- modification to registration of charset ks_c_5601-1987
- Re: modification to registration of charset ks_c_5601-1987
- Re: modification to registration of charset ks_c_5601-1987
- Re: modification to registration of charset ks_c_5601-1987
- Re: modification to registration of charset ks_c_5601-1987
- RE: modification to registration of charset ks_c_5601-1987
- Re: Typo in IANA charset file
- RE: modification to registration of charset ks_c_5601-1987
- Re: modification to registration of charset ks_c_5601-1987
- Never too late to fix a problem!
- RE: Never too late to fix a problem! (charset-fixes)
- RE: Never too late to fix a problem! (charset-fixes)
- RE: Never too late to fix a problem! (charset-fixes)
- RE: Never too late to fix a problem! (charset-fixes)
- RE: Never too late to fix a problem! (charset-fixes)
- RE: Never too late to fix a problem! (charset-fixes)
- Registration of new character set
- RE: Never too late to fix a problem! (charset-fixes)
- Re: Registration of new character set
- Re: Registration of new character set
- Re: Registration of new character set
- Re: Registration of new character set
- Re: Registration of new character set
- RE: modification to registration of charset ks_c_5601-1987
- Re: Registration of ISO 8859-16
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Registration of new charset: UTF-32LE
- Registration of new charset: UTF-32BE
- Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Registration of new charset
- Question on charsets
- Re: Question on charsets
- Re: Registration of new charset
- Registration of new charset: ISO 8859-16
- q about gb 2312/gbk
- Re: q about gb 2312/gbk
- Re: q about gb 2312/gbk
- Re: q about gb 2312/gbk
- Re: q about gb 2312/gbk
- Re: q about gb 2312/gbk
- Re: Registration of new charset: ISO 8859-16
- Re: Registration of new charset: ISO 8859-16
- RE: Registration of new charset: ISO 8859-16
- Re: Registration of new charset: ISO 8859-16
- RE: Registration of new charset: ISO 8859-16
- RE: Registration of new charset: ISO 8859-16
- Re: Registration of new charset: ISO 8859-16
- Suggested spelling correction for "repertoires"
- Re: Registration of new charset: ISO 8859-16
- RE: Registration of new charset: ISO 8859-16
- Variations of mapping from Japanese encodings to Unicode
- Registration of new charset: sjis-unicode-09
- Registration of new charset:sjis-jisx0221-1995
- Registration of new charset:sjis-jdk117
- Registration of new charset:eucjp-unicode-09
- Registration of new charset:eucjp-jisx0221-1995
- Registration of new charset:eucjp-open-19970715-ms
- Registration of new charset:eucjp-open-19970715-0201
- Registration of new charset:eucjp-open-19970715-ascii
- Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-jdk117
- Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-unicode-09
- Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-jisx0221-1995
- Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-cp932
- Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-19970715-ascii
- Re: Variations of mapping from Japanese encodings to Unicode
- Re: Variations of mapping from Japanese encodings to Unicode
- Re: Variations of mapping from Japanese encodings to Unicode
- Re: Variations of mapping from Japanese encodings to Unicode
- ISO 8859-16 is a national security threat :)
- Re: ISO 8859-16 is a national security threat :)
- Re: ISO 8859-16 is a national security threat :)
- Re: ISO 8859-16 is a national security threat :)
- Re: ISO 8859-16 is a national security threat :)
- Registration of a new charset
- Re: Registration of a new charset
- RE: Registration of a new charset
- Re: Registration of a new charset
- Re: Variations of mapping from Japanese encodings to Unicode
- Re: Variations of mapping from Japanese encodings to Unicode
- Registration of new charset: GSM default alphabet
- Re: Variations of mapping from Japanese encodings to Unicode
- Re: Registration of new charset: sjis-unicode-09
- Re: Registration of new charset:sjis-jisx0221-1995
- Re: Registration of new charset:sjis-jdk117
- Re: Registration of new charset:eucjp-unicode-09
- Re: Registration of new charset:eucjp-jisx0221-1995
- Re: Registration of new charset:eucjp-open-19970715-ms
- Re: Registration of new charset:eucjp-open-19970715-0201
- Re: Registration of new charset:eucjp-open-19970715-ascii
- Re: Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-jdk117
- Re: Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-unicode-09
- Re: Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-jisx0221-1995
- Re: Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-cp932
- Re: Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-19970715-ascii
- Re: Registration of new charset: sjis-unicode-09
- RE: Registration of a new charset
- RE: Registration of a new charset
- RE: Registration of a new charset
- RE: Registration of a new charset
- Re: Registration of a new charset
- Registration of new charset: SAMI-WS2
- Re: Registration of new charset: SAMI-WS2
- Registering GBK and GB18030 in the IANA charset registry
- Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in the IANA charset registry
- Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in the IANA charset registry
- Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in the IANA charset registry - MIMEsuitability
- Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in the IANA charset registry - draftnov09
- Registration of new charset: GEOSTD8
- Re: Registration of new charset: GEOSTD8
- Re: Registration of new charset: GEOSTD8
- ISO 8859 -8:1999
- Re: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- Re: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- Re: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- RE: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- Re: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- RE: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- RE: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- Re: Fw:(by [email protected])Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in theIANA charset registry
- Re: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- Re: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- Re: Fw:(by [email protected])Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in theIANA charset registry
- Definition of charset "macintosh"
- Re: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- Re: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- Re: ISO 8859 -8:1999
- Re: Fw:(by [email protected])Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in theIANA charset registry
- ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro
- Re: ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro
- ISO 8859-6 (was: ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro)
- Registration of new charset CESU-8
- RE: ISO 8859-6 (was: ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro)
- Re: Registration of new charset CESU-8
- Re: Registration of new charset CESU-8
- Re: Registration of new charset CESU-8
- RE: ISO 8859-6 (was: ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro)
- Re: Registration of new charset CESU-8
- Re: Registration of new charset: SAMI-WS2
- Re: Definition of charset "macintosh"
- Japanese-XML (Re: Registration of new charset:iso2022jp-19970715-ascii)
- Re: Registration of new charset: GEOSTD8
- Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in the IANA charset registry
- Re: codesets updates query
- codesets updates query
- Re: Definition of charset "macintosh"
- Re: Definition of charset "macintosh"
- Re: Fw:(by [email protected])Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in theIANA charset registry
- Re: (TC304.2484) codesets updates query
- Re: ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro
- Re: ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro
- Revised registration request for new charset CESU-8
- Re: Revised registration request for new charset CESU-8
- Registration of new charset GB18030
- Re: Registration of new charset GB18030
- Registration of new charset GB18030
- Registration of new charset GBK
- RE: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Bugs in IANA character-sets list
- RE: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- RE: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- RE: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- RE: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- RE: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- RE: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- RE: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- RE: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00
- =?utf-8?B?UkU6IGNvbW1lbnRzIG9uIGRyYWZ0LXllcmdlYXUtdXRmOC1yZXYy?==?utf-8?B?LTAw?=
- RE: comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00
- Inquiry on GB18030 and GBK IANA charsets registrations
- Re: Bugs in IANA character-sets list
- Re: =?utf-8?B?UkU6IGNvbW1lbnRzIG9uIGRyYWZ0LXllcmdlYXUtdXRmOC1yZXYy?==?utf-8?B?LTAw?=
- Re: Bugs in IANA character-sets list
- =?utf-8?B?UkU6IFJFOiBjb21tZW50cyBvbiBkcmFmdC15ZXJnZWF1LXV0Zjgt?==?utf-8?B?cmV2Mi0wMA==?=
- Re: RE: comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00
- draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00 - unused octet values
- RE: draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00 - unused octet values
- Re: RE: comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00
- RE: RE: comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00
- Re: RE: comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00
- Re: comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00
- Re: comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00
- Re: draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00 - unused octet values
- Re: RE: comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00
- Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: comments on draft-yergeau-utf8-rev2-00
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Fixing redirects for 'character-sets' directory
- Re: Fixing redirects for 'character-sets' directory
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Registration of new charsets: UTF-32, UTF-32BE, UTF-32LE
- RE: Revised registration request for new charset CESU-8
- RE: Revised registration request for new charset CESU-8
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Fixing redirects for 'character-sets' directory
- RE: Fixing redirects for 'character-sets' directory
- RE: Fixing redirects for 'character-sets' directory
- Re: RFC 2279 (UTF-8) to Full Standard
- Re: Honey - this was a virus
- Re: Honey - this was a virus
- Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- Registration of new charset GBK (fwd)
- Registration of new charset csPTCP154
- Re: Registration of new charset csPTCP154
- Re: Registration of new charset csPTCP154
- Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- KS_C_5601 (was: Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Re: KS_C_5601 (was: Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Registration of new charset csPTCP154
- Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- RE: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- Re: Registration of new charset csPTCP154 (fwd)
- Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- questions about windows-949
- Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd)
- Re: questions about windows-949
- Re: ignore dashes etc. (was Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Re: ignore dashes etc. (was Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Re: ignore dashes etc. (was Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Re: ignore dashes etc. (was Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Re: ignore dashes etc. (was Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Re: ignore dashes etc. (was Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Re: ignore dashes etc. (was Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Re: ignore dashes etc. (was Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Re: ignore dashes etc. (was Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- Re: ignore dashes etc. (was Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))
- question about length of charset names
- question about valid chars for charset names
- Proposal for insensitive registration
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Proposal for insensitive registration
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Registration of new charset csPTCP154 (fwd)
- Reason for 'csXXX' alias
- Registration of new charset [IBM1047]
- Re: Proposal for insensitive registration
- Re: Proposal for insensitive registration
- Re: Proposal for insensitive registration
- Re: Proposal for insensitive registration
- Correction to the Character Set Registry document -- ISO-IR instead ofECMA Registry
- Re: Proposal for insensitive registration
- Re: Registration of new charset [IBM1047]
- Re: Correction to the Character Set Registry document -- ISO-IRinstead ofECMA Registry
- Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Location of charset list archives
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Location of charset list archives
- Re: Location of charset list archives
- Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- registration of our character sets
- Re: registration of our character sets
- Re: registration of our character sets
- IANA Charset MIB (for Printer MIB v2)
- Re: IANA Charset MIB (for Printer MIB v2)
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Location of charset list archives
- RE: IANA Charset MIB (for Printer MIB v2)
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- RE: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- RE: IANA Charset MIB [renamed textual convention]
- Re: Registration of new charset csPTCP154
- Registration of new charset BOCU-1 refreshed
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1 refreshed
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1 refreshed
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1 refreshed
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1 refreshed - UTF-8
- Info about charsets
- Re: Info about charsets
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- some IANA registrations look like repertoires not charsets?
- Re: some IANA registrations look like repertoires not charsets?
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: some IANA registrations look like repertoires not charsets?
- Re: some IANA registrations look like repertoires not charsets?
- Re: some IANA registrations look like repertoires not charsets?
- Re: some IANA registrations look like repertoires not charsets?
- Re: some IANA registrations look like repertoires not charsets?
- Re: some IANA registrations look like repertoires not charsets?
- Approval of new charset csPTCP154 (fwd) (fwd)
- Re: Registration of new charset csPTCP154 (fwd)
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1 refreshed - UTF-8
- Re: some IANA registrations look like repertoires not charsets?
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1 refreshed - UTF-8
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1 refreshed - UTF-8
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Registration of new charset [IBM1047]
- Registration of new charset [IBM1047]
- Registration of new charset BOCU-1 refreshed 2
- Re: Registration of new charset BOCU-1 refreshed 2
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- I approve the Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Approval of new charset csPTCP154 (fwd) (fwd)
- Re: Registration of new charset [IBM1047]
- I approve the registration of new charset IBM1047
- Registration of new charset IBM1047
- Registration of new charset BOCU-1
- Registration of new charset PTCP154
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- No Subject
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- IANA Charset MIB draft-01 (8 October 2002)
- FW: PMP> IANA Charset MIB draft-01 (8 October 2002)
- New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-02.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- test message - ignore
- subscribing?
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- internationalization/ISO10646 question
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- =?UTF-8?B?VVRGLTggaW50ZXJvcCB0ZXN0aW5n?=
- =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFVURi04IGludGVyb3AgdGVzdGluZw==?=
- RE: UTF-8 interop testing
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- Re: Proposal for additional Aliases to IANA registry of character sets
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-02.txt for STANDARD
- Re: draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-02.txt for STANDARD
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question
- UTF-8 interop testing, take 2
- =?utf-8?B?VVRGLTggaW50ZXJvcCB0ZXN0aW5nLCB0YWtlIDM=?=
- =?utf-8?B?UkU6IFVURi04IGludGVyb3AgdGVzdGluZywgdGFrZSAz?=
- Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- RE: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- Re: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- Re: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- Re: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- RE: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- Re: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- Re: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- Re: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- Re: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3
- RE: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- RE: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- Re: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- RE: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- RE: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- Re: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3
- Re: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3
- RE: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3
- Re: Proposed changes to UTF-8 draft
- No Subject
- Meaningful XML Conversion from Word, RTF, HTML, Text and PDF?
- Re: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3
- Re: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3
- Re: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3
- draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-03.txt...
- IANA Charset MIB v02 (10 Feb 2002)
- FW: PMP> IANA Charset MIB v02 (10 Feb 2002)
- draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-04.txt...
- GB 18030 Information Required
- Re: GB 18030 Information Required
- Re: GB 18030 Information Required
- RE: GB 18030 Information Required
- AW: Re: registration of our character sets
- RE: draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-04.txt...
- Re: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3
- Re: draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-04.txt...
- Re: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3
- FW: [A CJK IME for full Unicode]
- Registration of new charset KOI7-switched
- Re: draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-04.txt...
- ECMA-cyrillic alias iso-ir-111 sore
- Re: ECMA-cyrillic alias iso-ir-111 sore
- Re: ECMA-cyrillic alias iso-ir-111 sore
- Re: ECMA-cyrillic alias iso-ir-111 sore
- Re: ECMA-cyrillic alias iso-ir-111 sore
- search feature
- Re: Registration of new charset KOI7-switched
- Charset Identity and Registration Questions
- asmo-708 and csiso2022jp, IANA vs. Microsoft
- Re: ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro
- Re: ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro
- Re: ISO 8859-11 Latin/Thai + Euro
- Does the Charset Registry still function?
- Re: Does the Charset Registry still function?
- Re: Does the Charset Registry still function?
- Re: Does the Charset Registry still function?
- Re: Does the Charset Registry still function?
- Re: Does the Charset Registry still function?
- Re: Does the Charset Registry still function?
- Re: Does the Charset Registry still function?
- Thai Font
- New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt
- RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt
- RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt
- RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt
- Re: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt
- RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt
- Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)
- RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt
- Re: Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)
- RE: Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)
- RE: Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)
- RE: Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)
- RE: Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)
- Re: Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)
- Revision of UTF-8 history in draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt
- Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_15"
- Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF03_IRV"
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_15"
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF03_IRV"
- TEST
- Re: TEST
- RE: TEST
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251]
- Re: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251]
- RE: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251]
- Re: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251]
- Re: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251]
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- RE: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- RE: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- RE: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251]
- ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
- Re: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- RE: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- RE: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- RFC 3629 / STD 63 - UTF-8 published
- unsubscribe
- Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"
- Re: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
- Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
- RE: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
- Bug on iana site
- Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
- Re: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- Activity?
- Re: Activity?
- From Unicode Consortium: Proposed changes to Bidi
- Re: I approve the registration of new charset IBM1047
- What's up?
- Amiga-1251 registration status?
- Hello Everybody!
- Re: Hello Everybody!
- Fwd: Registration of new charset KOI7-switched
- Fwd: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- Fwd: Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF03_IRV"
- Re: ECMA-cyrillic alias iso-ir-111 sore
- Re: Fwd: Registration of new charset KOI7-switched
- Re: Fwd: Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF03_IRV"
- Re: Fwd: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- RE: Fwd: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- RE: Fwd: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- RE: Fwd: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
- Proposal for Addition of New Alias Names to Existing Iana RegisteredCharacter Sets - REPOSTING REQUEST
- Re: Proposal for Addition of New Alias Names to Existing IanaRegistered Character Sets - REPOSTING REQUEST
- Re: Proposal for Addition of New Alias Names to Existing IanaRegistered Character Sets - REPOSTING REQUEST
- Re: ECMA-cyrillic alias iso-ir-111 sore
- Re: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251]
- Re: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251]
- Re: Proposal for Addition of New Alias Names to Existing IanaRegistered Character Sets - REPOSTING REQUEST
- Re: Proposal for Addition of New Alias Names to ExistingIanaRegisteredCharacter Sets - REPOSTING REQUEST
- Fwd: RE: Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"(Registered)
- Fwd: RE: Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_15"(Registered)
- Fwd: RE: Fwd: Registration of new charset KOI7-switched (registered)
- RE: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2 (Registered)
- RE: Fwd: Registration of new charset KOI7-switched(registered)(updated)
- Re: Fwd: RE: Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF03_IRV"(Registered)
- Re: Fwd: RE: Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1"(Registered)
- Re: Fwd: RE: Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_15"(Registered)
- RE: Fwd: RE: Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF03_IRV"(Registered)
- Re: Proposal for Addition of New Alias Names to ExistingIanaRegisteredCharacter Sets - REPOSTING REQUEST
- Re: Fwd: RE: Re: Register EBCDIC Character Set "OSD_EBCDIC_DF03_IRV"(Registered)
- Re: Proposal for Addition of New Alias Names toExistingIanaRegisteredCharacter Sets - REPOSTING REQUEST
- [ietf-charsets] Recent charset additions and issues
- Re: [ietf-charsets] Recent charset additions and issues
- FW: charset review mailing list? (number)
- Re: FW: charset review mailing list? (number)
- RE: [ietf-charsets] Recent charset additions and issues
- Change to charset registry for "ECMA-cyrillic"
- RE: Change to charset registry for "ECMA-cyrillic" (updated)
- RE: Change to charset registry for "ECMA-cyrillic" (updated)
- RE: Change to charset registry for "ECMA-cyrillic" (updated)
- RE: Change to charset registry for "ECMA-cyrillic" (updated) (char-set)
- RE: Change to charset registry for "ECMA-cyrillic" (updated) (char-set)
- RE: Change to charset registry for "ECMA-cyrillic" (updated) (char-set)
- Re: Change to charset registry for "ECMA-cyrillic" (updated) (char-set)
- RE: FW: charset review mailing list? (update)
- ID aai... thanks
- read it immediately
- Fwd: Unicode 4.0.1 Released
- Hello Iana
- hiIana
- Hi Iana
- hiIana
- hiIana
- Re: IANA Character Set Registration Procedures
- MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
- Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
- Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
- Fixing the IANA charset registry
- Fwd: Re: Bugs in IANA character-sets list
- Re: Fixing the IANA charset registry
- Re: Fixing the IANA charset registry
- Re: Fixing the IANA charset registry
- Re: Fixing the IANA charset registry
- Re: Fixing the IANA charset registry
- RE: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
- Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
- Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
- Re: Fixing the IANA charset registry
- Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
- Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
- Charset name length(s)
- Re: Charset name length(s)
- IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- Re: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- Re: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- RE: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- Re: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- RE: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- Re: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- Re: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- RE: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- Re: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- Fw: Thoughts on IETF registration
- Re: Fw: Thoughts on IETF registration
- IANA Character Set Registration Submittal - Disposition of comments
- Re: UCS-2/4 & BOM
- FW: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal - Disposition of comments
- IANA Character Set Registration Submittal - Disposition of comments
- RE: [rt.icann.org #3509] AutoReply: IANA Character Set RegistrationSubmittal - Disposition of comments
- windows-874
- Re: windows-874
- Re: windows-874
- Re: windows-874
- Re: windows-874
- RE: windows-874
- windows-1252
- Re: windows-1252
- Re: windows-1252
- Re: windows-1252
- Re: windows-1252
- RE: windows-1252
- Re: windows-1252
- Re: windows-1252
- Re: windows-1252
- RE: windows-1252
- Re: windows-1252
- Quad byte support for 3rd party apps
- ISO-8859-11 not in the IANA charset list
- Re: ISO-8859-11 not in the IANA charset list
- RE: ISO-8859-11 not in the IANA charset list
- Re: ISO-8859-11 not in the IANA charset list
- Re:
- Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Registration of new charset ISO-8859-11
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO-8859-11
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO-8859-11
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO-8859-11
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO-8859-11
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO-8859-11
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO-8859-11
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Cleanup (was: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer)
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- UTF-8 vs. Unicode (was: Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charsetreviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Cleanup (was: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer)
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- RE: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Fwd: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Fwd: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- UNSUBSCRIBE IETF-CHARSETS
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Problems (and non-problems) in charset registry (was: Re: Volunteerneeded to serve as IANA charset reviewer)
- Re: Problems (and non-problems) in charset registry (was: Re:Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer)
- Re: Problems (and non-problems) in charset registry (was: Re:Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer)
- Re: Problems (and non-problems) in charset registry
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- Registration of new charset ISO 11548-1
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- unknown-xyz (was: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer)
- Re: Registration of new charset BRF
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO 11548-1
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO 11548-1
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO 11548-1
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO 11548-1
- Re: Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO 11548-1
- Re: Registration of new charset BRF
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Registration of Windows Charsets (Thai, Japanese, GBK, Korean, Big-5)
- RE: Registration of Windows Charsets (Thai, Japanese, GBK, Korean,Big-5)
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO 11548-1
- Re: Registration of new charset BRF
- RE: Registration of Windows Charsets (Thai, Japanese, GBK,Korean,Big-5)
- Archives (was: Registration of Windows Charsets (Thai, Japanese, GBK, Korean,Big-5))
- Re: IANA Character Set Registration Submittal
- Re: Registration of new charset ISO 11548-1
- Re: Registration of new charset BRF
- Re: Registration of Windows Charsets (Thai, Japanese, GBK,Korean,Big-5)
- Re: Registration of Windows Charsets (Thai, Japanese, GBK,Korean,Big-5)
- Re: Registration of Windows Charsets (Thai, Japanese, GBK,Korean,Big-5)
- Re: Registration of new charset KZ-1048
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Registration of new charset KZ-1048
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Update of charset windows-1252
- Best fit (was: Update of charset windows-1252)
- RE: Best fit (was: Update of charset windows-1252)
- Re: Best fit (was: Update of charset windows-1252)
- RE: Best fit (was: Update of charset windows-1252)
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252
- Re: Best fit
- RE: Best fit
- Re: Best fit
- Re: Best fit
- Re: Best fit
- Re: Best fit (was: Update of charset windows-1252)
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252
- Re: Best fit
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252
- Re: Best fit
- Re: Best fit
- RE: Best fit
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252
- Re: Best fit
- Some thoughts ..
- Re: Best fit
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252
- Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Windows-1252 Best Fit tables.
- [OT] Re: Windows-1252 Best Fit tables.
- RE: [OT] Re: Windows-1252 Best Fit tables.
- RE: [OT] Re: Windows-1252 Best Fit tables.
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: (SPAM: 5.001) Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 2
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- GSM 03.38 substitution character?
- RE: GSM 03.38 substitution character?
- Re: GSM 03.38 substitution character?
- Re: GSM 03.38 substitution character?
- RE: GSM 03.38 substitution character?
- Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- Re: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- Re: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- RE: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- Re: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- Re: GSM 03.38 substitution character?
- RE: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- Re: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- Re: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- Re: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- OT: format=flowed (was: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004])
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- RE: format=flowed (was: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004])
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- Re: format=flowed
- RE: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- Re: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- RE: Update of charset windows-1252, draft 3
- RE: Windows Code Pages 932, 936, 949 and 950
- Registration submittals
- My draft for windows 1252
- RE: My draft for windows 1252
- Re: My draft for windows 1252
- RE: My draft for windows 1252
- Re: My draft for windows 1252
- RE: My draft for windows 1252
- Re: My draft for windows 1252
- Re: My draft for windows 1252
- RE: My draft for windows 1252
- Re: My draft for windows 1252
- Re: My draft for windows 1252
- RE: My draft for windows 1252
- Re: My draft for windows 1252
- RE: My draft for windows 1252
- Re: My draft for windows 1252
- Re: Registration of new charset KZ-1048
- Registration of new charset KZ-1048
- Re: My draft for windows 1252
- Another registry oddity
- [IANA #42454] Fwd: Re: Registration of new charset KZ-1048
- RE: [IANA #42454] Fwd: Re: Registration of new charset KZ-1048
- FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: FW: ban the use and implementation of UTF-7
- Re: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004]
- Re: Request for egistration of character set TSCII for TAMIL language
- Re: Request for egistration of character set TSCII for TAMIL language
- Re: Request for egistration of character set TSCII for TAMIL language
- (resend) Request for egistration of character set TSCII for TAMILlanguage
- plain ASCII version of TSCII charset registration request
- Re: plain ASCII version of TSCII charset registration request
- RE: Request for egistration of character set TSCII for TAMIL language
- RE: Request for egistration of character set TSCII for TAMIL language
- Re: plain ASCII version of TSCII charset registration request
- RE: Request for egistration of character set TSCII for TAMIL language
- Re: Request for egistration of character set TSCII for TAMIL language
- Re: plain ASCII version of TSCII charset registration request
- Re: updating of Unicode TN #15 (TSCII-Unicode mapping table)
- Re: Request for registration of character set TSCII for TAMIL language
- RE: Request for registration of character set TSCII for TAMIL language
- Re: plain ASCII version of TSCII charset registration request
- Update of windows 1252
- RE: Update of windows 1252
- Re: Update of windows 1252
- RE: Update of windows 1252
- RE: Update of windows 1252
- RE: Update of windows 1252
- Re: Update of windows 1252
- windows 936
- Re: windows 936
- Re: windows 936
- Re: windows 936 - REMOVE ME PLEASE
- RE: windows 936
- windows-1258 - I have more code page updates to ask for review:
- [email protected] windows 1250 - another update toreview :)
- Re: [email protected] windows 1250 - another update toreview :)
- Re: windows-874 new registration
- Re: [email protected] windows 1250 - another update toreview :)
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- Re: [email protected] windows 1250 - another update toreview :)
- RE: [email protected] windows 1250 - another update toreview :)
- Re: [email protected] windows 1250 - another update toreview :)
- windows 1250 - another update to review :)
- Re: windows 1250 - another update to review :)
- Re: windows-874 new registration
- Re: windows-874 new registration
- Re: windows-874 new registration
- Re: windows-874 new registration
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- Re: windows-874 new registration
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- Re: windows-874 new registration
- Re: windows-874 new registration
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- [IANA #72087] Request for IETF Registration of Tamil language charsetTSCII
- [IANA #82021] Update of windows 1252
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- Re: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- Re: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- RE: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- Re: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- Re: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- Re: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- RE: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- Re: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- RE: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- RE: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- RE: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- RE: Indicating charset variants (was: RE: windows 936)
- Bugs in IANA character-sets registry
- Dear [email protected] June 88% 0FF
- RE: ra.MedHelp 70832
- Clearance: Save up to 75%.
- Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- RE: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- RE: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- RE: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- RE: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- RE: Registering a charset alias
- doof
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- RE: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Re: Registering a charset alias
- Test message
- Registration of new charset CP51932
- Re: Registration of new charset CP51932
- Re: Registration of new charset CP51932
- Re: Registration of new charset CP51932
- Re: Registration of new charset CP51932
- Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP51932
- Re: Registration of new charset CP51932
- RE: Registration of new charset CP51932
- Re: Registration of new charset CP51932
- Re: Registration of new charset CP51932
- Registration of new charset CP51932
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- RE: Registration of new charset CP51932
- Re: Registration of new charset CP51932
- Re: Registration of new charset CP51932
- RE: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- RE: Registration of new charset CP50220
- RE: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- RE: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- RE: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- RE: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- RE: Registration of some code pages
- RE: Registration of new charset CP50220
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- RE: Registration of new charset CP50220
- RE: Registration of some code pages
- RE: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- RE: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- RE: Registration of some code pages
- RE: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- RE: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of some code pages
- Re: Registration of new charset CP50220
- RE: Registration of new charset CP50220
- Registration of new charset CP50220
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- RE: windows 936
- Re: windows-874 new registration
- RE: windows-874 new registration
- shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Re: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- RE: shift_jis / windows-31J
- Big5 / CP950
- Re: Big5 / CP950
- Improvement of charset registration link page (was: Re: Big5 / CP950)
- RE: Big5 / CP950
- RE: Big5 / CP950
- Re: Big5 / CP950
- RE: Big5 / CP950
- Re: Big5 / CP950
- RE: Big5 / CP950
- Re: Big5 / CP950
- RE: Common/Limited Use
- How to register 'unicode'/'unicodeFFFE' ?
- Re: How to register 'unicode'/'unicodeFFFE' ?
- Registration of new charset 'unicodeFFFE'
- Re: How to register 'unicode'/'unicodeFFFE' ?
- Re: How to register 'unicode'/'unicodeFFFE' ?
- Re: How to register 'unicode'/'unicodeFFFE' ?
- Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- RE: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- RE: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- RE: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- RE: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Registration of new charset 'unicode'
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Registration of new charset 'unicode'
- Encodings and the web
- RE: Are charset names supposed to be case sensitive?
- Re: Encodings and the web
- Re: Registration of new charset 'unicode'
- Re: Encodings and the web
- Re: Encodings and the web
- Re: Encodings and the web
- Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- RE: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- Re: Encoding Standard (mostly complete)
- New charset registry entry for iso-8859-11, anybody?
- Re: New charset registry entry for iso-8859-11, anybody?
- RE: New charset registry entry for iso-8859-11, anybody?
- New Version Notification for draft-seantek-text-nfo-02.txt
- Re: [IANA #1119825] ISO-IR links are obsolete in Character Setsregistry
- Re: [IANA #1119825] ISO-IR links are obsolete in Character Setsregistry
- Re: [IANA #1119825] ISO-IR links are obsolete in Character Setsregistry
- Registration of new charset utf-7-imap
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.9