RE: Unicode progress

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>]

> The main argument made by the CJK camp against unicode is that many of the
> characters assigned the same code point do not in fact have the same appearance.
> I am not in a position to judge the validity of these arguments; the only 
> character sets I am familar with are those for English and Hebrew. However,
> since we're talking about UTF-2 here, which I believe handles UCS-3 and UCS-4,
> this isn't a fight we need to get into here. 

Who are taling about UTF-2 at where?

What is UCS-3?

What does is mean that UTF-2 handles UCS-4?

							Masataka Ohta

PS

Do you mind if I unify "a" and alpha with the second glyph and call it
EG_UNIFIED_ALPHABET_A? If you think you can't answer, who, do you think,
is at the position to judge it?

1......................
1........********......
1.......*........*.....
1................*.....
1................*.....
1......*********.*.....
1.....*.........**.....
1....*...........*.....
1....*...........*.....
1....*..........**.....
1.....**********..*....
1......................

2......................
2......................
2......................
2...........*****......
2................*.....
2......*******...*.....
2.....*.......**.*.....
2....*..........**.....
2....*..........**.....
2....*........**.*.....
2.....********....*....
2......................

3......................
3.................*....
3..................*...
3......*******.....*...
3.....*.......**...*...
3....*..........*.*....
3....*..........**.....
3....*........**.*.....
3.....********....*....
3......................