I saw the “one of…”, but they aren’t defined in the RFC? Your spirit of Limited Use sounds about right for big5 though. Thanks, Shawn From: Ira McDonald [mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com]
Hi Shawn,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com> wrote: Moved the note, Removed big5+, if anyone knows other examples, I'd include those.
Um, by accident. I copied the original shift-jis registration, and used the windows-1252 as a template for this. I have no clue what the distinction is :) Changed to LIMITED USE. (reasoning that the variations are cause instability
between implementations, so I'd much rather have people picking something like UTF-8). Is there a definition of these terms? All of them should be OBSOLETE in favor of UTF-* ;-) I'd use that if I could get away with it.
________________________________________
Two example ISO 10646 equivalency tables: http://unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/OBSOLETE/EASTASIA/OTHER/BIG5.TXT http://unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/MICSFT/WINDOWS/CP950.TXT Additional information: Big5-HKSCS is one example, Microsoft Code Page 950, and several font specific variations are other examples. Although not authoritative, the following references may also be of Additional information about the many variants of Big5: The wide variety of existing variations of Big5 may make it Intended usage: LIMITED USE |