[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: q about gb 2312/gbk
At 3:28 PM +0200 8/23/01, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>query:
>are all these charset names you have seen used "in the wild" where
>MIME charset names should be used, or are they charsets that you
>know about which are used in some context, and you think there
>should be registered names for them?
>
>this will have most influence on the "intended usage" section....
One really can't prove the negative about finding something in the
wild, but here is a data point. Of all the mail archives that IMC and
VPNC keep, the following is what appears as explicit charsets given
in content-type lines (with a count of how many times):
big5: 20
default: 3
euc-kr: 40
gb2312: 61
iso-2022-jp: 303
iso-2022-kr: 9
iso-8859-1: 4817
iso-8859-15: 3
iso-8859-2: 39
iso-8859-7: 8
iso-8859-8: 4
iso-8859-9: 3
koi8-r: 142
ks_c_5601-1987: 1
standard: 2
unknown-8bit: 62
us-acsii: 4
us-ascii: 51491
utf-16be: 1
utf-7: 2
utf-8: 73
windows-1251: 12
windows-1252: 11
windows-1255: 2
windows-1257: 4
x-roman8: 1
x-unicode-2-0-utf-7: 1
x-unknown: 25
x-user-defined: 5
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium