Re: KS_C_5601 (was: Re: Registration of new charset GB18030 (fwd))

[Mark Davis <mark@macchiato.com>]

Gakk. What a mess. Is anything in progress to fix it?

Mark
__________
http://www.macchiato.com
◄  “Eppur si muove” ►

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>
To: "Mark Davis" <mark.davis@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <iana@iana.org>; <ietf-charsets@iana.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 17:50
Subject: KS_C_5601 (was: Re: Registration of new charset GB18030
(fwd))


> Hello Mark,
>
> There is an archive of this list at:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-charsets/
>
> with search. Please have a look at it, e.g.
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-charsets/2001AprJun/0033.html
.
>
> Regards,    Martin.
>
> At 16:02 02/07/02 -0700, Mark Davis wrote:
>
> >We had a question come up that I'm hoping to get some feedback on.
In the
> >registry, there are two cases where the same code page is given
with
> >different years. See below. Anytime two names are aliases, they
have to
> >point to precisely the same mapping. Now, I can believe that
> >ANSI_X3.4-1968 is identical with ANSI_X3.4-1986, but it seems
surprising
> >that KS_C_5601-1987 is identical with KS_C_5601-1989. Can anyone
confirm
> >that these are in fact identical?
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >--------------------------------
>
> >Name: KS_C_5601-1987 [RFC1345,KXS2]
> >MIBenum: 36
> >Source: ECMA registry
> >Alias: iso-ir-149
> >Alias: KS_C_5601-1989
> >Alias: KSC_5601
> >Alias: korean
> >Alias: csKSC56011987
> >
> >
> >Mark
> >___
> >mark.davis@us.ibm.com
> >IBM, MS 50-2/B11, 5600 Cottle Rd, SJ CA 95193
> >(408) 256-3148
> >fax: (408) 256-0799
>
>