[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Registration of 6 charsets
Martin;
> >> There is no detailed description in English
> >>
> >> The current BCP does require published description
> >> but does not require it in English
>
> I agree that there is no strict requirement; still it would be
There is strictly no requirement. That is the rule.
> a very good thing
I disagree but can see no point to discuss with you.
> >> Four of them are declared not suitable for use in MIME
> >>
> >> While it is not unclear when one should say "not suitable
> >> for use in MIME", one can automatically make a charset
> >> not shuitable for use in MIME by using some characters
> >> in the charset name, anyway
>
> This is a completely confused comment. All of the registrations
> are suitable for use with MIME, because all of them allow to
> respect the CR/LF conventions of MIME.
I'm afraid you are completely confused. I can see no requirement of
"CR/LF conventions" neither in RFC2278 nor for the suitability
for MIME use.
> >> JIS X 0213 is not yet published
> >>
> >> It's content was publisedh by WWW and it is now available
> >> on papers.
>
> JIS X 0213, for each of it's characters, lists the ISO 10646
> equivalent. That's very nice for the characters that have equivalents
> in ISO 10646.
It is a problem of ISO 10646.
But, JIS X 0213 is fine.
Your point has nothing to do with the requested registration.
Masataka Ohta