Re: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3

[Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>]

On torsdag, feb 6, 2003, at 22:34 Europe/Stockholm, Martin Duerst wrote:

> Hello Patrick, Ned,
>
> I agree we need to move forward. But everybody on this list
> (except you two) may be at loss as to what it means to
> "whatever is necessary to make this happen".
>
> Do you need more reports of successful interoperability?
> If yes, anything in particular?
> Do you need a formal report about the interoperability
> results? If yes, are there good examples of other such
> reports? Who should produce this report? Does it have
> to be Francois, or could it be somebody else?
> Anything else that is needed?

I think it will be enough by referencing the mail Francois created 
which can be viewed as:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-charsets/2003JanMar/0039.html

I _might_ need information from you all exactly what applications you 
have used to view the message successfully.

     paf

>
> Regards,    Martin.
>
>
> At 10:51 03/02/06 -0800, ned.freed@mrochek.com wrote:
>>> So, it is IESG meeting today (as every 2nd week). What do you all 
>>> want
>>> me to report?
>>
>>> I.e. since many moons back, I have a standing issue on the agenda 
>>> which
>>> is an action point of mine to move RFC 2279 to Standard Status.
>>
>>> This is _URGENT_ as other RFC's are waiting for it!
>>
>>> I can not let this take forever. Please.....
>>
>> Permit me to chime in here in support of Patrik. We _really_ need to 
>> get
>> to closure on this document. Please do whatever is necessary to make 
>> this
>> happen. Thanks.
>>
>>                                 Ned
>