Re: UTF-8 interop testing, take 3

[Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>]

Hello Patrick, Ned,

I agree we need to move forward. But everybody on this list
(except you two) may be at loss as to what it means to
"whatever is necessary to make this happen".

Do you need more reports of successful interoperability?
If yes, anything in particular?
Do you need a formal report about the interoperability
results? If yes, are there good examples of other such
reports? Who should produce this report? Does it have
to be Francois, or could it be somebody else?
Anything else that is needed?

Regards,    Martin.


At 10:51 03/02/06 -0800, ned.freed@mrochek.com wrote:
>>So, it is IESG meeting today (as every 2nd week). What do you all want
>>me to report?
>
>>I.e. since many moons back, I have a standing issue on the agenda which
>>is an action point of mine to move RFC 2279 to Standard Status.
>
>>This is _URGENT_ as other RFC's are waiting for it!
>
>>I can not let this take forever. Please.....
>
>Permit me to chime in here in support of Patrik. We _really_ need to get
>to closure on this document. Please do whatever is necessary to make this
>happen. Thanks.
>
>                                 Ned