[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

OT: format=flowed (was: Registration of new charset [ISO-2022-JP-2004])



Erik van der Poel wrote:

> maybe all this is too much for an IANA charset registration

s/maybe/certainly/ - mail oddities like 76, 78, 998, etc. aren't
relevant for the charset registry, unless we manage to create
charset names that are too long for a 4646 / 2231 "enhanced"
2047 word.  The 4646 folks used "pc-multilingual-850+euro" as a
worst case, it should work. 

> maybe it belongs in an RFC?

IMO nothing's wrong with RFC 2646.

Frank