[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: UTF-16

To: Harald Alvestrand <Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.no>
Subject: Re: Fwd: UTF-16
From: MURATA Makoto <murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 13:55:55 +0900
Cc: ietf-charsets@iana.org, murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp
In-reply-to: <3.0.2.32.19980724165634.0165b420@127.0.0.1>

Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> 
> Not accepted. I do not detect consensus about whether the BOM is
> mandatory in all cases including very short strings or not.

I would like to stay involved in this discussion, since I am one of 
the authors of text/xml & application/xml RFC.  I feel oblidged to 
make a new RFC when the final decision is inconsistent with the current 
RFC.

I am not a member of the ietf-charsets list.  I would appreciate it if 
people send a copy to me.

Makoto

Fuji Xerox Information Systems

Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp

References:
- Re: Fwd: UTF-16
  - From: Harald Alvestrand <Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.no>

Prev by Date: Re: Charset reviewer appointed
Next by Date: I am now on the ietf-charsets ML.
Prev by thread: Re: Fwd: UTF-16
Next by thread: Charset reviewer appointed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread