[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
asmo-708 and csiso2022jp, IANA vs. Microsoft
- To: ietf-charsets@iana.org
- Subject: asmo-708 and csiso2022jp, IANA vs. Microsoft
- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 06:53:58 +0200
- Original-recipient: rfc822;ned+ietf-charsets@mrochek.com
- Spam-test: False ; -1.1 / 4.5
Hi,
Reading through [1] I noticed that Microsoft does not map the same
charset label to the same windows code page for the following two
charsets:
"iso-2022-jp" => 50220
"csiso2022jp" => 50221
"iso-8859-6" => 28596
"iso-ir-127" => 28596
"iso_8859-6:1987" => 28596
"iso_8859-6" => 28596
"ecma-114" => 28596
"arabic" => 28596
"csisolatinarabic" => 28596
"asmo-708" => 708
"csiso2022jp" is listed as alias for "iso-2022-jp" as "asmo-708" is
listed as alias for "iso-8859-6". Now the first case is probably not an
issue since Microsoft already uses different windows code pages for
"iso-2022-jp" (50220 and 50222) but the asmo-708 case looks rather odd.
Is there something one should know about asmo-708 or are windows code
pages 28596 and 708 identical?
[1]<http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/charsets/charset4.asp>