[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Charset reviewer appointed

To: Dan Kegel <dank@alumni.caltech.edu>
Subject: Re: Charset reviewer appointed
From: MURATA Makoto <murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 10:13:21 +0900
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.no>,"Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, unicore@unicode.org,Multiple Recipients of Unicore <unicore@unicode.org>, kenw@sybase.com,ietf-charsets@iana.org
In-reply-to: <3.0.5.32.19980727085832.008729b0@ni.net>

Dan Kegel wrote:
> >Making the BOM optional is an upper-compatible change.
> 
> What would the consequences be at this point for XML
> if this group tried to mandate a byte order for "UTF-16"
> and mandate a BOM for "marked-UTF-16"?

The XML WG has to discuss, but I think XML can be revised 
accordingly.

Makoto
 
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
 
Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp

References:
- Re: Charset reviewer appointed
  - From: Dan Kegel <dank@alumni.caltech.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: Revised proposal for UTF-16
Next by Date: Re: Charset reviewer appointed
Prev by thread: Re: Charset reviewer appointed
Next by thread: Re: Charset reviewer appointed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread