[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"

To: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
From: MURATA Makoto <murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 14:31:38 +0900
Cc: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@INNOSOFT.COM>, erik@netscape.com,ietf-charsets@ISI.EDU, murata@fxis.fujixerox.co.jp,Tatsuo_Kobayashi@justsystem.co.jp
In-reply-to: <199805180356.MAA11373@sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>

Martin J. Duerst wrote:
> Something else that should be added to the registration information
> is that UTF-16 always should refer to the newest version of Unicode/
> ISO 10646. This has been discussed on the unicore list, but not here,
> but it is very crucial.

How about this?

As long as the character repertoires and code point assignments of 
ISO 10646 and those of Unicode are in sync, this charset refers to 
the latest version of Unicode/ISO 10646.

Makoto

Fuji Xerox Information Systems

Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
  - From: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>

References:
- Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
  - From: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
Next by Date: Re: Widetext (was Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16")
Prev by thread: Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
Next by thread: Re: Registration of new charset "UTF-16"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread