RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt

[Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>]

Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> And I don't like any application of the term "repertoire" here,
> because that has an orthogonal application to the repertoire of
> abstract characters encoded. Thus the "repertoire" for Unicode
> changes with each extension for a new version. The range of
> accessible code points, however, does not, and constitutes an
> architectural constant.

Good point.  Changed to "If the range of character numbers is restricted to
U+0000..U+10FFFF (the UTF-16 accessible range),..."

-- 
François