[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in the IANA charset registry
- To: Anthony Fok <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Registering GBK and GB18030 in the IANA charset registry
- From: Bruno Haible <[email protected]>
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 12:26:40 +0100 (CET)
- Cc: [email protected], Kevin Lau <[email protected]>,Fai <[email protected]>, James Su <[email protected]>,Shouhua Wang <[email protected]>, Jian Wu <[email protected]>,Leon Zhang <[email protected]>, Yu Guanghui <[email protected]>,Roger So <[email protected]>, Pablo Saratxaga <[email protected]>,zhaoway <[email protected]>, Yu Mingjian <[email protected]>,Chen Xiangyang <[email protected]>, Dirk Meyer <[email protected]>,Markus Scherer <[email protected]>, Ken Lunde <[email protected]>,[email protected], [email protected]
- In-reply-to: <20011109162100.A4954@sunrise>
- References: <20011109144947.A4932@sunrise> <20011109162100.A4954@sunrise>
Anthony Fok writes:
> Here is a first draft for the GB18030 registration.
Looks good. One remark, though, about MIME. While GB18030 is in theory
usable with MIME (because it's ASCII compatible), the facts that
- GB18030 characters are in unambiguous 1:1 correspondence with
21-bit Unicode characters,
- the GB18030 converter is somewhat big (due to the GBK table
size),
imply that mails should better be sent in UTF-8 encoding than in
GB18030 encoding. Because then the interoperability with mailers that
don't include a GB18030 converter is increased.
Therefore I would suggest to remove the "suitable for use in MIME"
sentence.
Bruno