[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- To: charsets <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- From: Markus Scherer <[email protected]>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:37:14 -0700
- Organization: IBM
- Original-recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
- References: <[email protected]>
- Spam-test: False ; 0.4 / 5.2
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4)Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
Sorry for my confusing reply. Both Mark and Ken are right - Mark in interpreting what I intended to point out, and Ken in that every protocol that does _not_ claim to pass text through unchanged can forbid whichever characters and code points it wants.
markus
Mark Davis wrote:
> ... if you
> simply strip a character willy-nilly, and yet purport not to be changing
> the text, you are violating Unicode conformance clause C10. ...
> Of course, this is just a guess as to what Markus meant ;-)
Thank you! :-)
markus
--
Opinions expressed here may not reflect my company's positions unless otherwise noted.