[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed

To: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>,Ira Mcdonald <imcdonal@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:53:17 +0100
Cc: ietf-charsets@iana.org
In-reply-to: <199912160648.PAA29543@sh.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
References: <199912160431.XAA22463@appsrv2.sdsp.mc.xerox.com>

At 15:27 16.12.99 +0900, Martin J. Duerst wrote:
>I think the distinction is not that important in this case,
>I could live with both. But it would be great to see this
>getting done soon. It has been a long time.
With that sentiment, I fully agree.

               Harald

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no

References:
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
  - From: Ira Mcdonald <imcdonal@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
- Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
  - From: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
Next by Date: RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
Prev by thread: Re: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
Next by thread: RE: Fwd: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread