[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Unicode progress

To: jerman-blazic@ijs.si (Borka Jerman-Blazic)
Subject: RE: Unicode progress
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1993 22:15:00 +0900 (JST)
Cc: ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM
In-reply-to: <220*/S=jerman-blazic/O=ijs/PRMD=ac/ADMD=mail/C=si/@MHS>; from"Borka Jerman-Blazic" at Oct 27, 93 12:52 pm
Resent-message-id: <01H4LIJXSLKY8WW3Q8@INNOSOFT.COM>

> I am strongly against the discussions related to the ISO issues on
> how UNICODE or ISO 10 646 was voted or developed.

> No one can claim what exactly happen,

Thank you for admitting the inappropriateness and invalidity of your
mails on ISO issues.

According to your suggestion, I politely ignore various incorrectness
in the rest of your mail on ISO issues on how UNICODE or ISO 10 646 was
voted or developed.

I'll be quite happy if such confusing explanations as yours never seen in
this ML.

							Masataka Ohta

PS

To reduce the noise level, this mail is not directed to WNILS.

References:
- RE: Unicode progress
  - From: Borka Jerman-Blazic <jerman-blazic@ijs.si>

Prev by Date: RE: Unicode progress
Next by Date: Compatibility with Unicode
Prev by thread: RE: Unicode progress
Next by thread: Subsribe
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread