RE: Small comment to UTF-7 draft

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>]

I already explained why UTF-7 can't be a meaningful experiment. So,
I won't repeat it.

I have some commnet on psuedo discussions between braindead people.

> | >ISO 8859-1 as their standard (and ISO 8859-1 is the defacto standard today)

In my entire carrier, I have seen various encoding methods including
EBCDIC. Still, I have never seen 8859/1 being used, though it may
be a defacto standard in small region of Europe.

> Flat 16-bits remains the long term
> preferred target encoding for ALL application domains.

No. It may be a not-so-preferred target in a little larger region of Europe.

That's all.


							Masataka Ohta