[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16

To: Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>
Subject: Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 16:50:57 +0100
Cc: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>,charsets <ietf-charsets@iana.org>
In-reply-to: <F7D4BDA0E5A1D14B99D32C022AEB7366A50358@alis-2k.alis.domain>
Original-recipient: rfc822;ned+ietf-charsets@mrochek.com
References: <F7D4BDA0E5A1D14B99D32C022AEB7366A50358@alis-2k.alis.domain>
Spam-test: False ; -3.4 / 5.2
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i

On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 08:57:26AM -0500, Francois Yergeau wrote:
> Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> > One wonders why W3C made UTF-16 the encoding of choice for XML.
> 
> One wonders where such misconceptions come from.  The default encoding in
> XML is UTF-8.  It's hard to see how "the encoding of choice for XML" can
> differ from the default.

I stand corrected. Thanks for the clarification, and Happy Xmas to all!

Best regards
keld

References:
- RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
  - From: Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>

Prev by Date: RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
Next by Date: Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
Prev by thread: RE: internationalization/ISO10646 question - UTF-16
Next by thread: =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFVURi04IGludGVyb3AgdGVzdGluZw==?=
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread