[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases

To: charsets <ietf-charsets@iana.org>
Subject: Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
From: Markus Scherer <markus.scherer@jtcsv.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:35:08 -0800
In-reply-to: <000501c3a5b7$2caab8d0$010210ac@simonb>
Organization: IBM
Original-recipient: rfc822;ned+ietf-charsets@mrochek.com
References: <000501c3a5b7$2caab8d0$010210ac@simonb>
Spam-test: False ; -2.1 / 4.5 ;EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4)Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Simon Butcher wrote:
> Just a quick question: Why don't the entries for ISO-10646-UCS-2 and ISO-10646-UCS-4 their abbreviated aliases, UCS-2 and UCS-4 respectively?

Missing verb like "refer to"?

Anyway, you can use the UTF-* names instead of the above.

markus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
  - From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>

References:
- ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
  - From: Simon Butcher <pickle@alien.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Registration of new charset [Amiga-1251] - revision 2
Next by Date: Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
Prev by thread: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
Next by thread: Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread