[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases

To: Markus Scherer <markus.scherer@jtcsv.com>
Subject: Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 02:30:09 +0100
Cc: charsets <ietf-charsets@iana.org>
In-reply-to: <3FB1722C.7000801@jtcsv.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;ned+ietf-charsets@mrochek.com
References: <000501c3a5b7$2caab8d0$010210ac@simonb> <3FB1722C.7000801@jtcsv.com>
Spam-test: False ; -5.0 / 4.5 ;EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:35:08PM -0800, Markus Scherer wrote:
> Simon Butcher wrote:
> >Just a quick question: Why don't the entries for ISO-10646-UCS-2 and 
> >ISO-10646-UCS-4 their abbreviated aliases, UCS-2 and UCS-4 respectively?
> 
> Missing verb like "refer to"?
> 
> Anyway, you can use the UTF-* names instead of the above.

that would not refer to the ISO standard, but to Unicode in stead.
There are subtle differences in doing that.

Best regards
keld

References:
- ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
  - From: Simon Butcher <pickle@alien.net.au>
- Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
  - From: Markus Scherer <markus.scherer@jtcsv.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
Next by Date: RE: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
Prev by thread: Re: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
Next by thread: RE: ISO-10646-UCS-x aliases
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread