[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
> Please look at RFC 2640 "Internationalization of FTP" (July 1999,
> Proposed Std status currently), which says:
> The character set defined for international support of FTP SHALL be
> the Universal Character Set as defined in ISO 10646:1993 as amended.
Whoops. That should definitely be updated to ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000
and ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001, as amended.
If anyone was truly trying to still implemented based on 10646-1:*1993*,
with its 31 amendments, just to get up to the Unicode 3.0 level, I'd
feel *real* *real* sorry for them.
> Currently, no codesets
> have been defined outside of the 2 byte BMP.
Currently that statement is false.
> The Unicode standard version 2.0 [UNICODE] is consistent with the
> UCS-2 subset of ISO/IEC 10646. The Unicode standard version 2.0
> includes the repertoire of IS 10646 characters, amendments 1-7 of IS
> 10646, and editorial and technical corrigenda.
And that statement should also be updated to reflect current
reality.
--Ken