[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt



> Please look at RFC 2640 "Internationalization of FTP" (July 1999,
> Proposed Std status currently), which says:

>   The character set defined for international support of FTP SHALL be
>   the Universal Character Set as defined in ISO 10646:1993 as amended.

Whoops. That should definitely be updated to ISO/IEC 10646-1:2000
and ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001, as amended.

If anyone was truly trying to still implemented based on 10646-1:*1993*,
with its 31 amendments, just to get up to the Unicode 3.0 level, I'd
feel *real* *real* sorry for them.

> Currently, no codesets
>   have been defined outside of the 2 byte BMP.

Currently that statement is false.

>   The Unicode standard version 2.0 [UNICODE] is consistent with the
>   UCS-2 subset of ISO/IEC 10646. The Unicode standard version 2.0
>   includes the repertoire of IS 10646 characters, amendments 1-7 of IS
>   10646, and editorial and technical corrigenda.

And that statement should also be updated to reflect current
reality.

--Ken