[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com> writes:
>> > > UTF-8 never needs a 'byte-order' signature.
>> >
>> >This is unfortunately not true, except in the limited realm
>> >of properly internationalized protocols
>>
>> As for example IETF protocols.
>
> Errr, some IETF protocols. I have no way to tell an FTP server what is the
> charset of a file I'm uploading, nor does the server have any way of telling
> me the charset of a file I'm downloading. And even if it had a way (like in
> HTTP), the server most probably wouldn't know and would either not tell or
> lie.
Those protocols should be extended to send this information, since it
is not possible to handle text encoded in multiple encodings
otherwise. I don't think it is for UTF-8 to solve these problems,
which BOM partially tries to do. (HTTP supports this, the current FTP
extensions addresses it partially, lying implementations cannot be
standardized away though.)