[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- To: ietf-charsets@iana.org
- Subject: RE: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt
- From: Francois Yergeau <FYergeau@alis.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 15:52:47 -0400
- Original-recipient: rfc822;ned+ietf-charsets@mrochek.com
- Spam-test: False ; 1.1 / 5.2
Martin Duerst wrote:
> As far as I understand most contributions on the list in the past
> day or so, the standard should discourage the BOM, but it currently
> doesn't.
That much is clear. It seems there will have to be a draft-03 with some
additional language in that direction.
> > > UTF-8 never needs a 'byte-order' signature.
> >
> >This is unfortunately not true, except in the limited realm
> >of properly internationalized protocols
>
> As for example IETF protocols.
Errr, some IETF protocols. I have no way to tell an FTP server what is the
charset of a file I'm uploading, nor does the server have any way of telling
me the charset of a file I'm downloading. And even if it had a way (like in
HTTP), the server most probably wouldn't know and would either not tell or
lie.
--
François