[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: 10646 and progr.languages
- To: jerman-blazic@ijs.si (Borka Jerman-Blazic)
- Subject: RE: 10646 and progr.languages
- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1993 23:17:26 +0900 (JST)
- Cc: ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM
- In-reply-to: <252*/S=jerman-blazic/O=ijs/PRMD=ac/ADMD=mail/C=si/@MHS>; from"Borka Jerman-Blazic" at Nov 12, 93 8:15 am
- Resent-message-id: <01H57VBJ1QOY8WVZU0@INNOSOFT.COM>
> This is a forward message from sc22wg20 mailing list. It shows what
> SC22 people think about (at least some of them) about ISO 10 646/
> natural languages.
It seems to me that they are talking about unnatural languages.
For what purpose SC22 is chartered?
> >Forty(40) is untenable. C and C++ are case sensitive so the Abc and
> >ABC are different variables.
External symbol of ANSI C could be case insensitive. Is the behaviour
different in ISO C?
Masataka Ohta