[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)
- To: 'Francois Yergeau' <FYergeau@alis.com>, charsets <ietf-charsets@iana.org>
- Subject: RE: Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)
- From: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 08:58:25 -0700
- Original-recipient: rfc822;ned+ietf-charsets@mrochek.com
- Spam-test: False ; -12.8 / 4.5
Hi,
A quick review of the Internet-Drafts index indicates that at least
the following groups are doing (one or more) Stringprep profiles:
- IPS iSCSI
- LDAPbis
- SASL
- XMPP
- IDNA
The SLP Project (no longer IETF chartered) is also looking at
Stringprep for service URL and service attribute comparisons.
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald
High North Inc
-----Original Message-----
From: Francois Yergeau [mailto:FYergeau@alis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:59 AM
To: charsets
Subject: RE: Stringprep (was RE: New draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-05.txt)
Martin Duerst wrote:
> I think I would advocate that we update stringprep/nameprep/idna
> immediately to Unicode 4.0 if it were not for the fact that
> this technology is just now being introduced.
You need not bundle stringprep/nameprep/idna all in one big lump. I think
stringprep could very well (and should, IMHO) be updated right now, so that
new profiles can use all of 4.0. But I agree that IDNA should not bite the
bullet too hastily.
--
François