[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?

To: Markus Scherer <markus.scherer@jtcsv.com>
Subject: Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
From: ned.freed@mrochek.com
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:07:46 -0800 (PST)
Cc: charsets <ietf-charsets@iana.org>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:53:06 -0800"<41B0A802.1050109@jtcsv.com>
List-Id: <ietf-charsets@mail.apps.ietf.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-charsets-owner@mail.apps.ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mailserv@mail.apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe%20ietf-charsets>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mailserv@mail.apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe%20ietf-charsets>
Original-recipient: rfc822;ned+ietf-charsets@mrochek.com
References: <200412011536.57749.blilly@erols.com> <41B0A802.1050109@jtcsv.com>
Spam-test: False ; 0.2 / 4.5 ; NO_REAL_NAME

> Welcome to a dormant forum! :-)

> Dieter Köhler <service@philo.de> already reported the missing MIBenum on this list on 2002-04-16.
> There are also charset names in the list that are longer than the stated maximum of 40, and there
> are names that refer to character repertoires rather than charsets. Etc.

Indeed. And there are plenty of other glitches in there as well that we
have been unable to  get fixed. Perhaps it is time to approach IANA
again with the intent of getting this mess cleaned up.

				Ned

Follow-Ups:
- Fixing the IANA charset registry
  - From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>

References:
- MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
  - From: Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com>
- Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
  - From: Markus Scherer <markus.scherer@jtcsv.com>

Prev by Date: Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
Next by Date: Fixing the IANA charset registry
Prev by thread: Re: MIBenum value for ISO-10646-J-1?
Next by thread: Fixing the IANA charset registry
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread