[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32

To: Keld J$BS(B n Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>,Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 09:52:17 +0900
Cc: Keld J$BS(B n Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>,Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, Mark Davis <mark@macchiato.com>,ietf-charsets@iana.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
In-reply-to: <20010520191503.B31107@rap.rap.dk>
References: <4.2.0.58.20010519182402.03ee0fc0@popd.ix.netcom.com><"from asmusf"@ix.netcom.com><4.2.0.58.20010513113314.01c39950@popd.ix.netcom.com><B0015962675@euvig1.dtc.lon.ime.reuters.com><4.2.0.58.20010513113314.01c39950@popd.ix.netcom.com><20010514184801.A16154@rap.rap.dk><4.2.0.58.20010519182402.03ee0fc0@popd.ix.netcom.com>

At 19:15 01/05/20 +0200, Keld J$BS(Bn Simonsen wrote:
>You really should not do this. UCS-4 is the canonical representation of
>10646. UTF-32 would be misleading, as the UCS-4 is not a transformation 
>format,
>but the "real thing".

Which one? Little endian? Big endian? Or some cris-cross version?

Regards,   Martin.

References:
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
  - From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
  - From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
  - From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
  - From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>

Prev by Date: Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
Next by Date: Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
Prev by thread: Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
Next by thread: Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread