[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32

To: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Subject: Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 16:15:32 +0200
Cc: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>,Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, Mark Davis <mark@macchiato.com>,ietf-charsets@iana.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
In-reply-to: <20010526155000.A7144@rap.rap.dk> <"from keld"@dkuug.dk>
References: <4.2.0.58.20010519182402.03ee0fc0@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Sender: keld@rap.rap.dk
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 03:50:00PM +0200, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:52:17AM +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:
> > At 19:15 01/05/20 +0200, Keld J$BS(Bn Simonsen wrote:
> > >You really should not do this. UCS-4 is the canonical representation of
> > >10646. UTF-32 would be misleading, as the UCS-4 is not a transformation 
> > >format,
> > >but the "real thing".
> > 
> > Which one? Little endian? Big endian? Or some cris-cross version?
> 
> The default endianness of UCS-4 is wee defined.

I meant:

The default endianness of UCS-4 is well defined.

Keld

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
  - From: Tex Texin <texin@progress.com>

References:
- Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
  - From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
Next by Date: Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
Prev by thread: Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
Next by thread: Re: Registration of new charset: UTF-32
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread