[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF

To: "Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
Subject: Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
From: Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@INNOSOFT.COM>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 08:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@INNOSOFT.COM>,Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@INNOSOFT.COM>, ietf-charsets@INNOSOFT.COM,IETF Languages <ietf-languages@uninett.no>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 21 Jul 1997 10:31:00 +0200 (MET DST)"<Pine.SUN.3.96.970721102542.245f-100000@enoshima>
References: <01IKPWTYFFAMANDI74@INNOSOFT.COM>

> That was a long time ago. I already answered to this mail, also
> a long time ago. I have received several other mails in this
> discussion that also date back about three weeks. The headers
> below suggest that there is a big delay at THOR.INNOSOFT.COM.

Not that it matters, but this is incorrect. The delay was on
sigurd.innosoft.com, not thor.innosoft.com.

> This seems to affect all the postings on the IETF charsets
> list. If something else is the problem, please tell us what
> to do to get it fixed.

> Can somebody at Innosoft look into the problem?

The problem has already been found and fixed. If it hadn't been why do you
think the postings came through?

				Ned

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
  - From: "Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>

References:
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
  - From: Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@INNOSOFT.COM>
- Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
  - From: "Martin J. Duerst" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>

Prev by Date: Whither ANSI X3.64? (was Re: Suggested character set policy for theIETF)
Next by Date: Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
Prev by thread: Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
Next by thread: Re: Suggested character set policy for the IETF
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread