RE: Charset policy - Post Munich (fwd)

[Martin J. Dürst <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>]

Again, forwarded from Ed Hart.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 1997 18:42:12 -0400
From: "Hart, Edwin F." <HartEF1@APLMSG.JHUAPL.EDU>
To: "\"'Martin J. Dürst'\"" <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
Subject: RE: Charset policy - Post Munich

Actually, it depends where you read it in SC2/WG2 N1311, the final 
text of AMD-2.  The cover page listed it as "Format" but page 1 listed 
it as "format". Page 1 appears to be an oversight but that is the 
place from which I responded. Personally, I prefer "Format".  : )

Best regard,
Ed

----------
From:  Martin J. Dürst [SMTP:mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch]
Sent:  01 September, 1997 18:22
To:  Multiple Recipients of
Subject:  Re: Charset policy - Post Munich

On Mon, 1 Sep 1997, Misha Wolf wrote:

> Ed Hart responded privately but I trust he won't object to my 
forwarding his
> response:
>
> > From amendment 2:  UCS Transformation format 8 (UTF-8)

But I'm rather sure it's "Format" and not "format", in that case :-).